top of page
All Posts


๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ช๐๐ฅ๐ฃ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ฃ-๐ญ'๐?
Ten pages of warning letters dropped this week, possibly a record. Most came from CDER under the headline: "Unlawful Sale of Unapproved and Misbranded Drugs to U.S. Consumers Over the Internet." ๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ป'๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฎ๐น๐น, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐โ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ๐ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ: -Online compounding pharmacies promoting compounded GLP-1


๐๐๐ ๐๐. ๐๐ง๐: ๐ฃ๐ต๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐, ๐๐ต๐ผโ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด?
I was asked in another thread about which agency is most concerning (or something to that effect). And it got me thinking. Most regenerative medicine clinics worry about the ๐๐๐......and for good reason. The agency has cracked down on unapproved stem cell, SVF, and amniotic products. But hereโs what often gets missed: the ๐๐ง๐ is just as active, and their lens is very different. ๐๐ฟ๐ผ ๐๐ค๐๐ช๐จ: ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐๐ช๐๐ฉ ๐จ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฎ & ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ง๐ค๐ซ๐๐ก โช๏ธUnapproved biologics (e.g


PRP vs BMAC for Cartilage Growth?
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ด๐ด๐ฒ๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น? Thereโs no question PRP and BMAC can deliver value. Studies consistently show pain relief, improved function, and in some cases slowing of degeneration. For the right patient, those gains matter. But hereโs the problem: patients hear โ๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐โ or โ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐โ and expect regenerat
bottom of page
