๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ช๐๐ฅ๐ฃ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ฃ-๐ญ'๐?
- kparmstrong1
- Jan 8
- 1 min read

Ten pages of warning letters dropped this week, possibly a record.
Most came from CDER under the headline:
"Unlawful Sale of Unapproved and Misbranded Drugs to U.S. Consumers Over the Internet."
๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ป'๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฎ๐น๐น, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐โ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ๐ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ:
-Online compounding pharmacies promoting compounded GLP-1s (Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, Zepbound)
-Claims that compounded versions are โthe same asโ or โsimilar toโ FDA-approved brands
-FDAโs language is blunt: Misbranding. False equivalence. Unlawful sale
If this is true, then the message is unmistakable. FDA is drawing a line: compounded GLP-1s cannot be marketed as legitimate substitutes for branded drugs.
๐ง๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐:
-Where is the boundary between education and misbranding when describing compounded products?
-How should legitimate pharmacies and clinicians adjust their messaging to protect both themselves and their patients?
-Is this surge in letters a one-time sweep or the start of a new regulatory era?
From where I sit, this feels like a pivotal moment for the compounded GLP-1 market.
Has anyone seen the FDA issue this many letters for the same type of violations in a single update before, or is this a new chapter in enforcement?ย
๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ฃ-๐ญ'๐: ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ท๐๐๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฝ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐' ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ป-๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐๐ฃ-๐ญ'๐?



